Skip to content

Thomas Spijkerboer

Professor of Migration Law

  • Home
  • Coloniality
  • Europe
  • Deaths
  • Gender
  • Courts
  • Thomas blogs
  • About Thomas

Subsidiarity and ‘Arguability’: The European Court of Human Rights Case Law on Judicial Review in Asylum Cases

Subsidiarity and 'Arguability': The European Court of Human Rights Case Law on Judicial Review in Asylum Cases

Posted on January 23, 2015January 23, 2015

Post navigation

Published inSubsidiarity and ‘Arguability’: the European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law on Judicial Review in Asylum Cases (2009)

Recent Publications

  • Kunnen Europese universiteiten eigenlijk wel gedekoloniseerd worden? Overwegingen om aanSusan Legêne voor te leggen (2026)March 12, 2026
  • How strict is the European Court of Human Rights in migration cases? (with Ellen Desmet and Eva Sevrin, 2026)February 18, 2026
  • Met deze ene maatregel kunnen we iets doen tegen de woningnood en massatoerisme (2026)January 28, 2026
  • Spreiding in het volkshuisvestingsbeleid en rechterlijkeraciale afasie (met Mitchell Esajas, 2025)December 10, 2025
  • Akkoordjes met louche onderaannemers. De uitbesteding van het Europese migratie- en asielbeleid (2025, met Mohamed Anouar, Bachirou Ayouba Tinni, Rados Djurovic, Abdoulaye Hamadou, Gamze Ovacık, Mayan Sayed & Orçun Ulusoy)October 10, 2025
  • Home
  • Coloniality
  • Europe
  • Deaths
  • Gender
  • Courts
  • Thomas blogs
  • About Thomas
Thomas Spijkerboer Proudly powered by WordPress